As I have been saying for a long time nothing horrific about Trump ever surprises me anymore.
What would Justice
Jackson say? What did Nuremberg stand for? Our nation or part of it
has gone utterly insane. Our nation is better than that aren't we? A
question I never had to pose.
The story:
"President
Trump has indicated that he is considering pardons for several American
military members accused or convicted of war crimes, including
high-profile cases of murder, attempted murder and desecration of a
corpse, according to two United States officials.
The
officials said that the Trump administration had made expedited
requests this week for paperwork needed to pardon the troops on or
around Memorial Day.
One request is
for Special Operations Chief Edward Gallagher of the Navy SEALs, who is
scheduled to stand trial in the coming weeks on charges of shooting unarmed civilians and killing an enemy captive with a knife while deployed in Iraq.
The others are believed to include the case of a former Blackwater security contractor
recently found guilty in the deadly 2007 shooting of dozens of unarmed
Iraqis; the case of Maj. Mathew L. Golsteyn, the Army Green Beret
accused of killing an unarmed Afghan in 2010; and the case of a group of Marine Corps snipers charged with urinating on the corpses of dead Taliban fighters.
The
officials, who spoke on condition of anonymity because they were not
authorized to speak publicly, said they had not seen a complete list,
and did not know if other service members were included in the request
for pardon paperwork.
The White House
sent requests on Friday to the Justice Department’s Office of the
Pardon Attorney, which alerted the military branches, according to one
senior military official. Pardon files include background information
and details on criminal charges, and in many cases include letters
describing how the person in question has made amends.
The
official said while assembling pardon files typically takes months, the
Justice Department stressed that all files would have to be complete
before Memorial Day weekend, because the President planned to pardon the
men then. A second United States official confirmed the request
concerning Chief Gallagher.
The military branches referred questions to the Justice Department, which declined to comment on the matter.
Mr.
Trump has often bypassed traditional channels in granting pardons and
wielded his power freely, sometimes in politically charged cases that
resonate with him personally, such as the conviction of the former Arizona sheriff Joe Arpaio. Earlier this month, the president pardoned former Army First Lt. Michael Behenna, who had been convicted of killing an Iraqi during an interrogation in 2008.
While
the requests for pardon files are a strong sign of the president’s
plans, Mr. Trump has been known to change his mind and it is not clear
what the impetus was for the requests. But most of the troops who are
positioned for a pardon have been championed by conservative lawmakers
and media organizations, such as Fox News, which have portrayed them as
being unfairly punished for trying to do their job. Many have pushed for
the president to intervene. The White House declined to comment.
Pardoning
several accused and convicted war criminals at once, including some who
have not yet gone to trial, has not been done in recent history, legal
experts said. Some worried that it could erode the legitimacy of
military law and undercut good order and discipline in the ranks.
Maj. Mathew L. Golsteyn, left, the Army Green Beret accused of killing an unarmed Afghan in 2010. Creditvia the office of Rep. Duncan Hunter"
Image
“These
are all extremely complicated cases that have gone through a careful
system of consideration. A freewheeling pardon undermines that whole
system,” said Gary Solis, a retired military judge and armor officer who
served in Vietnam. “It raises the prospect in the minds of the troops
that says, ‘Whatever we do, if we can get the folks back home behind us,
maybe we can get let off.’”
Chief
Gallagher’s lawyer, Timothy Parlatore, was surprised by the news that
the president could be considering a pardon, and said ideally the chief
would be acquitted at trial.
“We want
the opportunity to exonerate my client,” Mr. Parlatore said in an
interview. “At the same time, there is always a risk in going to trial.
My primary objective is to get Chief Gallagher home to his family. To
that end, Chief Gallagher would welcome any involvement by the
president.”
Other than violating military law, the cases the president is said to be considering defy easy categorization.
Navy
SEALs who served with Chief Gallagher told authorities he
indiscriminately shot at civilians, gunning down a young woman in a
flowered hijab and an unarmed old man. They also said he stabbed a
teenage captive, then bragged about it in text messages. His trial is
set to start at the end of this month. If convicted, he faces life in
prison. He has pleaded not guilty and denies all charges.
Major
Golsteyn is charged with killing an Afghan man that he and other
soldiers said had bomb-making materials. After an interrogation, the
soldiers let the man go. Fearing that the man would return to making
improvised explosives, which had already killed two Marines in the area,
Major Golsteyn later said he killed the man.
Mr.
Trump has singled both men out on Twitter, calling Major Golsteyn a
“U.S. Military hero,” and praising Chief Gallagher for his service to
the country.
The Blackwater
contractor, Nicholas A. Slatten, is one of several Blackwater
contractors charged in the killing of 17 Iraqis and the wounding of 20
more on a Baghdad street. After a number of mistrials and other delays,
he is the only one who has been convicted.
The Marines charged in urinating on the corpse of a Taliban fighter were caught after a video of the act was found.
The
fact that the requests were sent from the White House to the Justice
Department, instead of the other way around, is a reversal of
long-established practices, said Margaret Love, who served as the United
States pardon attorney during the first Bush administration and part of
the Clinton administration.
Long
ago, presidents wielded clemency power directly, Ms. Love said, but that
changed at the end of the Civil War when President Lincoln delegated
review of clemency requests to his attorney general. Since then, cases
have generally been vetted by Justice Department lawyers before being
sent to the president.
President
Trump has upended that practice, often issuing pardons with little or
no notice to the Justice Department, she said, adding that the fact the
department is requesting files on men like Chief Gallagher at all
suggests that Attorney General William P. Barr is trying to re-exert
some authority over the process.
Process aside, she said that pardoning the men would be an abrupt departure from the past.
“Presidents
use pardons to send messages. They recognize when a process wasn’t just
or when punishments were too extreme, like for some nonviolent drug
cases,” she said. “If this president is planning to pardon a bunch of
people charged with war crimes, he will use the pardon power to send a
far darker message.”
Eric Schmitt, Maggie Haberman and Katie Benner contributed reporting.
