My all time favorite
of the MSNBC experts MSNBC commentators call on to explain the maze of
Trump mess is Chuck Rosenberg. He is a refreshing bit of calm in the stormy seas of Trump. He makes my blood pressure go down.
I
particularly liked his explanation today of direct vs. circumstantial
evidence when explaining Richard Burr's announcement that there was no
"direct" evidence of Russian
collusion by Trump. Yes, the word "direct" is important as Mr.
Rosenberg said. A jury can convict on circumstantial evidence and they
so all the time. Convicting on direct evidence is rarer. I breathed a sigh of relief!
Thank you Mr. Rosenberg for restoring the seas of calm!
No comments:
Post a Comment