Trump
deafeningly says he did not collude. To us who loathe this presidency
it surely does appear that he did collude but circumstantial evidence is
NOT enough to use as
evidence to impeach, most importantly to convict and remove him from
office. The biggest truth lies in the
answer to the question was TRUMP himself involved with the Russians and
is there EVIDENCE for Trump himself
colluding with Russia or was he even involved with the forces of Trump
to make him president with Russia's assistance. If there is no evidence
as Trump deafeningly says then
circumstantial evidence is not enough to convict and
remove. The rule of law means EVIDENCE not merely the assumption he, in
fact, did these dastardly acts that is
necessary even if we just know in our bones he did.
This is a running commentary on contemporary social, political and religious issues. From the Introduction of James Comey's book "A Higher Loyalty -- Truth, Lies and Leadership" "Man's capacity for justice makes democracy possible, but man's inclination to injustice makes democracy necessary" Reinhold Niebuhr
Tuesday, July 03, 2018
Evidence Russia Tipped Election for Trump ‘Staggering,’ Says Former U.S. Intel Chief James Clapper + My comment: Evidence
Intel Chief Jame's Clapper's statement above and link above is chilling. Still,
the biggest bombshell lies in the answer to the question did TRUMP
himself collude with the Russians. The most profound question becomes
is
there EVIDENCE for Trump himself colluding with Russia or even working
with the Trump campaign itself to elect him president with Russian help?
It
may be that Trump knew of the meeting in Trump Tower with
the Russians; that he was fully aware because we conclude that Trump
knew everything about his campaign and surely knew everything about what
Donald Jr. did every day. That I postulate that is not enough even
though it may
be an obvious inference. It is not enough to conclude what it appears
Trump probably -- emphasis on probably -- did know. Evidence, evidence, evidence; we must have the
evidence to impeach and convict him of collusion which would be a high crime of treason. The rule of law means EVIDENCE
not just assumption of evidence must be shown.
Mueller may have all the evidence he needs to show this inept unfit
president did collude with the Russians or that he knew and approved of
what his forces did with Russian help. If so Mueller, will present that
evidence to the American people in due time. Please God let it be so!
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Democratic Presidential Convention--On to November
I watched the Democratic convention last evening until my body's demand for sleep overtook me around midnight. Having followed thin...
-
Comment of Occupy Democrats: By Colin Taylor. I could not have said it better than this introductory thoughts by Colin. The president'...
-
DR. RICHARD BRIGHT'S TESTIMONY TODAY WAS DEVASTATING TO THE INEPT ALMOST CRIMINAL INACTION OF THE TRUMP ADMINISTRATION. I URGE EVERYO...
-
Nuclear Strike -- NO : I just read Steve Weisman's article in Truthout in which he thinks the US strike of Iran is imminent. There a...
No comments:
Post a Comment